Author :
Abstract
Anadolu yöresel mimarisi, katı kurallara göre tasarlanmaktan ziyade enformel veya sınıflandırılmamış tasarımları temsil eden, yerel yapı malzemelerinin kullanıldığı, Türkiye'deki geleneksel ve tarihi yapılardan oluşmaktadır. Bu analiz çalışması, 1983-Ağustos 2021 tarihleri arasında Web of Science (WoS) Core Collection'daki indekslerde 10 ülkeden 155 yazar tarafından yazılan 95 yayını kapsamaktadır. Literatürde en çok kullanılan anahtar kelimeler “geleneksel ev”, “kültürel miras” ve “restorasyon” olarak tespit edilmiştir. İngilizce, 72 makale ile Anadolu yöresel mimarisi literatüründe en çok kullanılan dildir ve onu Türkçe ve Hırvatça izlemektedir. Bu makaledeki bibliyometrik ağları oluşturmada kamuya açık bir yazılım olan VOSviewer kullanılmıştır. Ayrıca, ülkelerle ilgili sonuçlarda Birleşmiş Milletler’in (UN) ülkeleri sınıflandırma sistemi uygulanmıştır. Bu çalışma, Anadolu yöresel mimarisi literatürünün yaklaşık 40 yıllık tarihini WoS veritabanındaki belgelerde inceleyen ilk bibliyometrik çalışmadır. Çalışmanın, araştırmacıları Anadolu yöresel mimarisi hakkında güvenilir ve popüler veri tabanı olan Wos veritabanında daha fazla araştırma yapmaya teşvik etmesi ve bu alanda en üretken ülke olan Türkiye'nin dışına da konuyu tanıtması beklenmektedir.
Keywords
Abstract
Anatolian vernacular architecture is composed of traditional and historical buildings in Turkey, mainly by the use of local building materials representing informal and unclassified designs rather than designed in a strict manner. This analysis study comprehended 95 publications written by 155 authors from 10 countries, on indexes in Web of Science (WoS) Core Collection between 1983 and August 2021. The study showed that Turkey produced 87.37 % of the world’s publications on ‘Anatolian vernacular architecture’. The most used keywords in the literature were detected as ‘traditional house’, ‘cultural heritage’ and ‘restoration. English is the most used language of the Anatolian vernacular architecture literature with 72 articles followed by Turkish and Croatian. VOSviewer was used as the freeware tool for creating bibliometric networks in this article. Moreover, The United Nations (UN) system for country classification was applied in the outputs of the countries. This study is the first bibliometric study that investigates the documents including approximately 40 years of the Anatolian vernacular architecture literature in WoS database. It is expected that it may encourage scholars to carry out further studies on Anatolian vernacular architecture published in this reliable and popular database (WoS), and promote the topic outside of Turkey, which is the most productive country in this field.
Keywords
- Aksoy, E. (1963). Orta mekan: Türk sivil mimarisinde temel kuruluş prensibi. Mimarlık ve Sanat, 7 (8), 39-92.
- Arel, A. (1982). Osmanlı konut geleneğinde tarihsel sorunlar. Ticaret Matbaacılık.
- Asatekin, N.G. (2007). Understanding traditional residential architecture. The Journal of Architecture, 10 (4), 389-414. https: //doi.org/10.1080/13602360500285518
- Bektaş, C. (1996). Türk evi. Yapı Kredi Yayınları.
- Benkari, N., Jamali, S.M., Caldieron, J. M. & Ebrahim, N.A. (2020). Research trends in vernacular architecture: A bibliometric study. ISVS e-journal, 8 (2), 72-91.
- Bourdier, J.P. (1989). Reading tradition. In Bourdier J. P. & Alsayyad N. (Eds.), Dwell- ings, settlements and traditions: Cross-cultural perspectives (pp.35-52). University Press of America.
- Brunskill, R.W. (1970). Illustrated handbook of Anatolian vernacular architecture. Fa- ber&Faber.
- Brunskill, R.W. (1981). Traditional buildings of Britain: an introduction to Anatolian vernac- ular architecture. Victor Gollanz.
- Denel, B. (1990). Maxims and traditions: Anatolian vernacular. In Turan M. (Ed.). Ver- nacular architecture, paradigms of environmental response (pp. 165-182). Gower.
- Deng, S., Tian, Y. & Zhang, H. (2009). Using the bibliometric analysis to evaluate global scientific production of data mining papers. In First International Workshop on Database Technology and Applications (pp. 233-238). IEEE Computer Society.
- Eldem, S.H. (1984). Türk evi: Osmanlı dönemi. Türkiye Anıt Çevre Turizm Değerlerini Koruma Vakfı.
- Fuchs, R. & Meyer-Brodnitz, M. (1989). The emergence of the central hall house-type in the context of 19th Palestine. In Bourdier J. P. & Alsayyad N. (Eds.), Dwellings, settlements and traditions: Cross-cultural perspectives (pp.403-424). University Press of America.
- Germen, A. (1974). Yöre mimarisi. Mimarlık, 11(127), 5-9.
- İmamoglu, Ç. (2000). Complexity, liking and familiarity: Architecture and non- architecture Turkish students' assessments of traditional and modern house facades. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 20 (1), 5-16. https: //doi.org/10.1006/jevp.1999.0155
- Kuban, D. (1995). Turkish hayat house. Eren Yayınları.
- Küçükerman, Ö. (1973). Anadolu’daki geleneksel Türk evinde mekan organizasyonu açısın- dan odalar. Türkiye Turing ve Otomobil Kurumu Yayınları.
- Küçükerman, Ö. & Güner, Ş. (1995). Anadolu mirasında Türk evleri. T.C. Kültür Bakanlığı Yayınları.
- Lawrence, R.J. (1987). Housing, dwellings and homes: Design, theory, research and practice. John Wiley and Sons.
- Lawrence, R.J. (1990). Learning from colonial houses and lifestyles. In Turan, M. (Ed.). Vernacular architecture: Paradigms of environmental response (pp. 219-260). Gower.
- Oliver P. (1989). Handed down architecture: tradition and transmission In Bourdier J. P. & Alsayyad N. (Eds.), Dwellings, settlements and traditions: Cross-cultural perspectives (pp.53-76). University Press of America.
- Oliver, P. (1990). Vernacular know-how. In Turan, M. (Ed.). Vernacular architecture: Par- adigms of environmental response (pp. 146-160). Gower.
- Rapoport, A. (1969). House, form and culture. Prentice Hall.
- Rapoport, A. (1989). On the attributes of tradition. In Bourdier J. P. & Alsayyad N. (Eds.), Dwellings, settlements and traditions: Cross-cultural perspectives (pp.77-106). University Press of America.
- Rapoport, A. (1990). System of activities and systems of settings. In Kent, S. (Ed.). Do- mestic architecture and the use of space: an interdisciplinary cross-cultural study (pp. 9-42). Cambridge University of Press.
- Rudofsky, B. (1964). Architecture without architects. Doubleday and Co.
- Sözen, M. & Eruzun, C. (1996). Anatolian vernacular houses. A Cultural Publication of Emlak Bankası.
- Stea, D. (1990). The ten smudge pots of vernacular building: Notes on explorations into architectural mythology. In Turan, M. (Ed.). Vernacular architecture: Paradigms of environmental response (pp. 20-30). Gower.
- Thelwall, M. (2008). Bibliometrics to webometrics. Journal of Information Science, 34 (4), 605–621. https: //doi.org/10.1177/0165551507087238
- Van, E.; Nees, J. & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: Vosviewer, a computer pro- gram for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84 (2), 523–538.
- Yıldırım, A. & Şimşek, H. (2018). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri, 11th Edition, Seçkin Publishing.
- Zan, B.U. (2012). Türkiye’de bilim dallarında karşılaştırmalı bibliyometrik analiz çalışması [Published doctorate dissertation]. Ankara University Social Sciences Institute.
- URL-1: ‚Vosviewer‛. http: //www.vosviewer.com/ (Access Date: 3 September 2021).
- URL-2: ‚World Economic Situation and Prospects as of mid-2021.‛ https: //www.un.org/development/desa/dpad/publication/world-economic-situationand-prospects-as-of-mid-2021/ 2021_UPDATE.pdf (Access Date: 01.09.2021).
