AHLAKİ AKIL, AHLAKİ DUYGULAR VE ÖZGECİLİĞİN GERÇEKLETİRİLMESİ: NAGEL, ZHANG ZAİ VE WANG FUZHİ ARASINDA KARŞILAŞTIRILMALI ÇALIŞMA

Author :  

Year-Number: 2016-3
Language : null
Konu : Felsefe
Number of pages: 196-213
Mendeley EndNote Alıntı Yap

Abstract

Keywords

Abstract

This paper begins with Thomas Nagel’s investigation of the possibility of altruism. Altruism, by Nagel’s definition, is “merely a willingness to act in consideration of the interests of other persons, without the need of ulterior motives.” The fundamental question Nagel investigates is: how is altruism possible? The reason why we need to investigate the possibility of altruism is exactly that an altruistic act is not readily exercised; it requires some effort on the part of the agent. Nagel discusses various cases of “motivational interference,” such as weakness of the will, cowardice, laziness, panic, etc. (Nagel: 66). In addition, we can also imagine that attitudes such as procrastination, apathy, inconsistency, and consideration for one’s future self all pose an obstacle to the causal efficacy of altruistic motivation. Therefore, a successful motivational theory of altruism must explain how altruism is possible under all these motivational interferences.

Keywords


  • Deleuze, Gilles. 2001. Empiricism and Subjectivity. (çev.) Constantin V. Boundas, New York: Columbia University Press.

  • Flanagan, Owen. 1990. “Identity and Strong and Weak Evaluation.” In Flanagan, Owen

  • & Rorty, Amélie Oksenberg Rorty (1990) (ed). Identity, Character, and Morality: Essays in Mo- ral Psychology. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 37-65.

  • Flanagan, Owen and Amélie Oksenberg Rorty. ed. 1990. Identity, Character, and

  • Frankfurt, Harry. 1971. “Freedom of the Will and the Concept of A Person.” Journal of

  • Philosophy LXVIII: 1, 1971, 5-20.

  • Hoffman, Martin L. 1981. “Is Altruism Part of Human Nature?” Journal of Personality

  • Mencius (1970). Mencius. (çev.) D.C. Lau. London: Penguin Books, 1970.

  • Korsgaard, Christine M. 1996. Creating the Kingdom of Ends. Cambridge, UK:Cambridge Uni- versity Press.

  • Lind, Marcia. 1990. “Hume and Moral Emotions.” In Flanagan, Owen & Rorty, Amélie

  • Oksenberg Rorty (1990) (eds). Identity, Character, and Morality: Essays in Moral Psychology. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 133-47.

  • Nagel, Thomas. 1970. The Possibility of Altruism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

  • Owen & Rorty, Amélie Oksenberg Rorty (1990) (eds). Identity, Character, and Morality: Essays in Moral Psychology. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 149-70.

  • Powell, Brian. 2005. “Revisiting Nagel on Altruism.” Philosophical Papers 34:2, 235-259.

  • Sherman, Nancy. 1990. “The Place of Emotions in Kantian Morality.” In Flanagan,

  • Slote, Michael. 2001. Morals from Motives. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

  • ZHANG Zai. 2006. The Complete Works of ZHANG Zai. Beijing, China: Zhonghua Books.

  • WANG Fuzhi. 1967. Commentary on ZHANG Zai’s Zhengmeng, 1685-1690. Taipei, Taiwan: Shijie Books.

  • _1974. Discourse on Reading the Great Collection of Commentaries

                                                                                                                                                                                                        
  • Article Statistics